Gazetteer logo

1. Main Features of the Gazetteer

 1.1 Place Name Index
 1.2 The Historic Counties of Great Britain
 1.3 Administrative areas
 1.4 The need for a fixed geographical reference frame
 1.5 Disclaimer

The gazetteer can be considered to have three main functions: it provides an exhaustive index to the place names of Great Britain; it relates each place name to its historic county; it relates each place name to a set of administrative areas. In Sections 1.1-1.3 of this introduction we discuss each of these aspects. In Section 1.4, we discuss the need for a fixed popular geographical reference frame for Britain and propose that the historic counties are the only sensible choice for such a reference frame.

1.1 Place Name Index

Over 50,000 place names are included (Column 1) alongside their National Grid reference (Column 2). The aim is to include every settlement (above isolated houses and farmsteads) which has a distinct name and identity. This includes hamlets, villages, towns and cities. Each district within an urban area which has a distinct name and identity has been included as a separate entry. Places whose names have more than one standard spelling are included under each spelling. Similarly, places with Welsh and English or Gaelic and English names are listed under both.

1.2 The Historic Counties of Great Britain

Full details are given in Column 3 of the historic county within which each place included in Column 1 lies.

The historic counties of Great Britain are geographical entities whose ages and origins vary. Most of those of England pre-date the Norman conquest. The thirteen historic counties of Wales were fixed by Statute in 1535 and most of those of Scotland are of at least this age. Whilst each county was probably created with some kind of administrative purpose in mind, the counties have long since come to represent something much more than this. They have become bedrocks of the history, culture and geography of Britain. They provide an instant means of reference to different parts of the country, to a set of cities, towns and villages; to distinctive scenery, architecture and wildlife; to particular industries and pastimes, accents and dialects, tourist attractions, weather and so on. A large literature focuses on each of the counties; they give their names to clubs and societies, to teams people play for. Above all else, they are places - places where people live and "come from", where they "belong".

In previous centuries the counties were directly utilised by Parliament for various administrative purposes (e.g. sheriffs, lieutenants, justices, parliamentary seats). However, no single administrative function has ever defined them. Their geographical identity has always been paramount. Whilst the counties are no longer directly used as the basis for any major administrative purpose, they remain important geographical and cultural entities. They are also the ultimate source of definition for the boundaries of many modern administrative areas.

Because various other types of statutorily created administrative areas have used (and still do) the word "county", there has long been a need for a terminology which distinguishes between the counties themselves and each of these sets of administrative areas. Such administrative areas have always been understood to be separate entities to the counties themselves, although based to a greater or lesser extent upon their areas. Between 1851 and 1881, the Census Reports used the phrase "Counties Proper" to distinguish between the historic counties and the Registrar-General's "registration counties" (these latter were entirely artificial creations intended to help the enumeration and analysis of the Censuses). After 1891 the Census Reports used the phrase "Ancient or Geographical Counties"" or simply "Ancient Counties" to distinguish the Counties themselves from the "administrative counties" (top tier local goverment areas) created in 1889.

The need for a distinguishing terminology still exists since there are presently two different sets of administrative areas each of which has been given the unqualified label "county" (i.e. those of the Local Government Act 1972 and those of the Lieutenancies Act 1997). The Encyclopaedia Britannica uses the phrase "historic county" to refer to one of the ancient of geographical counties. Another commonly encountered synonym is "traditional county". Within the Gazetteer, where necessary for clarity, we adopt the terminology used by the Encyclopaedia Britannica and refer to the counties themselves as the "historic counties". Any unqualified reference to "county" or "counties" should be taken to refer to one or more of the historic counties. (See the notes to Columns 4 for a discussion of the terminology we adopt for those areas labelled "counties" by the Local Government Act 1972.)

A Map of the Historic Counties is included as part of the gazetteer.

Despite the continued prominence of the historic counties in the cultural life of Britain and in common geographical parlance, many modern works of reference tend to overlook them. Often such works attempt to use local government areas as a basis for descriptions of geographical location. The problems and pitfalls of this approach are discussed in Section 1.4. The historic counties provide a far more sensible, fixed, reference frame to base such descriptions upon.

1.3 Administrative areas

The gazetteer provides details (Columns 4 - 8) of the main types of administrative area associated with each place name. Those included are local government areas, police areas, and the standard regions. These areas were chosen because they are those which the public or the media most commonly encounter. Other arguably important administrative areas currently not included in the gazetteer include the registration districts of births, deaths and marriages, the fire service areas, the commission of the peace areas (i.e. of magistrates courts) and the complex geographical areas of the National Health Service.

Each of the sets of administrative areas included in the gazetteer has been created in the recent past by an Act of Parliament for a specified administrative purpose. Each of them has no existence beyond its particular administrative remit. In particular, Parliament has never imposed any wider geographical or cultural role of any of them. The explanatory notes of Section 2 detail the relevant Act which governs the existence of each of these sets of areas. Brief notes are also given of the administrative purposes for which these areas exist.

1.4 The need for a fixed geographical reference frame

Each of the sets of administrative areas included in this gazetteer (Columns 4-8) forms its own "administrative geography". Each particular "administrative geography" is important within its own field and clearly a general understanding of the geographical organisation of the major forms of public administration is important. However, there has been an increasing trend in recent years (i.e. by publishers and the media in general) to try to use administrative areas as a basis for general descriptions of geographical location. There are several major drawbacks to such an approach:

(i) Such administrative areas were created to facilitate the provision of particular specified public services. They were not created to fulfill a general popular geographical (or cultural) role. To use them as such is to assign to them a function and status not given them by Parliament.

(ii) The names and areas of administrative units change frequently. For example, local government areas have been the subject of two major reforms in the last 30 years. Many of the current set are unfamiliar to many people and are unlikely ever to become familiar. It is unrealistic to expect people to re-learn their whole notion of "where places are" every 20 years or so.

(iii) There are several types of important administrative areas. There is no obvious reason to choose one type of "administrative geography" over another as a basis for general-purpose geography.

(iv) Many modern administrative units have names which are borrowed from a town or city within their area. This renders them useless as a basis for popular geography. Clearly, for example, one can't describe Swindon as being "in Swindon" or Telford as being "in Telford and Wrekin".

(v) Many administrative areas do not conform to commonly held ideas of cultural identity. Surely no-one can be expected to say "I come from Rhondda Cynon Taff" !

The interests of general-purpose geography require a geographical framework which is fixed, popularly understood and firmly rooted in history, tradition and commonly held concepts of cultural identity. The historic counties are the natural choice for this framework because:

(i) They are fixed in name and area.

(ii) They have provided the standard geographical framework of Britain for centuries. They are the only geographical framework which can logically be used for the description of past events. The relation of present and future events to the past requires their use. Imagine trying to write a history of Britain based upon sets of areas which radically changed every 20 years or so !

(iii) Their names and areas are still generally familiar to many people. Indeed, they are still commonly used by many as a basis for general-purpose geography.

(iv) They are still important cultural entities. Many people have a strong sense of loyalty to and identify with their county. Innumerable sporting, social and cultural activities are still based upon them.

(v) The names of all of the historic counties are now an acceptable part of Royal Mail postal addresses. (In contrast many modern local government area names are not acceptable since they clash with Post Town names).

The 6 counties of Northern Ireland, like those of Great Britain, are no longer used as the basis for any major form of public administration. Yet they are almost universally used as the standard geographical framework for Northern Ireland. The administrative areas of Northern Ireland are not generally used in a general-purpose geographical context. The case for the general adoption of this convention within Great Britain is overwhelming.

1.5 Disclaimer

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information within this gazetteer, the huge nature of such a publication means that errors must inevitably occur. We can do no better than to quote from the introduction to the 1848 edition of Lewes's Topographical Dictionary of England:
"The proprietors cannot entertain the hope that, in a work compiled from such a variety of sources, and containing notices so numerous and diversified, errors have not occurred. They have, however, regardless of expense, used the most indefatigable exertions to attain correctness, and to render the work as complete as possible; and they, therefore, trust that any occasional inaccuracy will receive the indulgence of the subscribers."

Valid HTML4.0! The Gazetteer of British Place Names is maintained by the Association of British Counties
Last updated 10th September 2006
All enquiries regarding the gazetteer should be addressed to